If in doubt, rent: Faringdon House, Oxfordshire

Faringdon House, Oxfordshire (Image: Knight Frank)
Faringdon House, Oxfordshire (Image: Knight Frank)

Renting a property has long been associated with those starting out on the property ladder but there is a long history of country houses, large and small, being tenanted for long periods of time.  Now the focus is very much on the sale of country houses with rentals being in the shade of their high-spending counterparts but there are still many fine houses available to those wishing to experiment with the country life or as a short-term solution.

Jane Austen was well-known for reflecting the social conventions of the aristocracy in her work and it’s interesting that one of the main characters in ‘Pride and Prejudice’, the wealthy Mr Bingley, rents ‘Netherfield House’ whilst he considered which house and estate he would establish himself in.  This again is a pattern that still holds true today with those seeking to move to either a new area or out of town, renting to get a better understanding of an area.  These opportunities are available today where houses such as Puddletown Manor in Dorset are available for rent (£9,000 pcm) but also for sale (£6m) at the same time.

Country houses have been let for a variety of reasons.  One of the most common was simply that it might be a subsidiary seat and rather than simply leave it empty it was often let as a source of income.  Sometimes this included the entire working estate so that the new occupant could fully assume the role and responsibilities of the country gent.  Increasingly though in the Victorian era the house was let separately from the estate which would continue to be managed and run by the original family.  This was often the preferred option for the newly wealthy who aspired to the status and amenity of a ‘country seat’ but did not require the estate to generate an income.

This is why houses such as the Faringdon House in Oxfordshire [pictured above] are attractive as they allow someone else to simply move in (albeit for a significant monthly rent of £10,000) and enjoy a grade-I listed Palladian villa without the added burdens of ownership.

Letting was a handy solution when the family finances were insufficient for they themselves to live there.  The Marquess of Lansdowne became first Governor General of Canada and then Viceroy of India from 1883-1894 specifically to improve his financial position and keep hold of his estates.  These jobs came with benefit of government accommodation which freed up the family seat for letting.  In a letter to his mother he explained,

“India means saving Lansdowne House for the family.  I should be able while there not only to live on my official income, but to save something every year.  If I can let Lansdowne House, I might by the time  I come home have materially reduced the load of debt which has become so terrible an incubus to us all…”.

(n.b. when the Marquess refers to Lansdowne House, he is referring to Bowood House rather than their London townhouse of the same name which was sold by the family in 1783.)

The Second World War also offered a convenient escape route for some owners as country houses were taken over by evacuated schools who then stayed on such as at Motcombe House in Dorset.  Although the use of country houses as schools had been an established practice for many years (the 1920s saw Stowe, Canford and Bryanston all become schools) the widespread use during wartime meant that it gained even greater acceptability.   For the Earl Fitzwilliam at Wentworth Woodhouse who had seen his spectacular house vandalised by troops and a vindictive Minister for Fuel and Power, Manny Shinwell, ordering the needless open cast mining of the gardens right up to the house, it was all too much and he let the house to become a training college for female PE teachers.

The letting of country houses has a long and varied history but it has mostly been driven by the need for country house owners to maximise their incomes.  Once the country house had ceased to be the physical embodiment of local political power following the reforms of the early 20th-century it became easier for families to simply move out and bring in tenants turning a costly extravagance into revenue.

Property details: ‘Faringdon House, Oxfordshire‘ [Knight Frank]

6 thoughts on “If in doubt, rent: Faringdon House, Oxfordshire

  1. Andrew July 27, 2010 / 14:56

    Lets also not forget over 4,000 houses owned by the National Trust, as a result of acquiring estates or from bequests, that require the trust not to sell the property, but which may not be big enough to generate enough visitors to pay for its upkeep:


    The Trust also owns some larger houses, such as Woolbeding House in West Sussex, which was rented to Simon Sainsbury and Stewart Grimshaw from the 1970s until Sainsbury’s death in 2006. The gardens will be open to the general public for the first time from 5 August 2010:


    Other rented Trust houses include:

    – Boarstall Tower – http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-boarstalltower
    – Hinton Ampner House – http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-hintonampnergarden
    – Newark Park – http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-vh/w-visits/w-findaplace/w-newarkpark/
    – Philipps House – http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-philippshouse_dintonpark
    – Shute Barton – http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-shutebarton
    (now being converted into National Trust holiday apartments)
    – Thorington Hall – http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-thoringtonhall
    – Tintinhull House – http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-tintinhullgarden

    Then there are the ones still lived in by the donor families:

    – Bradley Manor – http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-bradley
    – Great Chalfield Manor – http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-greatchalfieldmanor

    • countryhouses July 28, 2010 / 08:41

      Thanks Andrew – I hadn’t realised they had quite so many properties. Renting is probably the most accessible route to living in a NT house short of having one to give to them. Now, I have to go and see about my application to live in Hinton Ampner…!

  2. Oliver Chettle July 29, 2010 / 13:40

    The National Trust doesn’t own anything like 4,000 country houses. It owns two or three hundred historic houses, some of which are not country houses. It may own 4,000 houses including estate cottages.

    Lansdowne House was in London, so it was not what is conventionally referred to as a seat. The Marquess’s country seat was Bowood. I infer from his comment that he regarded it as a matter of course that it would be the London house that would have to go, if either of them. Lansdowne House was a particularly grand London residence, many similar aristocrats were content with a terraced house in town.

  3. Andrew July 30, 2010 / 08:50

    Oliver, I take your point, as I should have said ‘4,000 small estate houses/cottages’ to avoid confusion, to differentiate them from the roughly 173 country house seats owned by the National Trust.

    Regarding Lansdowne House, I’m wondering if the quote did actually refer to the London Lansdowne House (not Bowood House, Wiltshire), because the Marquess’ family owned the London house until 1929, when it was sold to the Bruton Club, and rented it out while not used by the family or when cash was needed.


  4. Andrew September 18, 2010 / 16:28

Leave a Reply to Oliver Chettle Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.